Difference between Utilitarianism and Kant theories

Question: Discuss about the Difference between Utilitarianism and Kant theories. Answer: Utilitarianism theory governs a perspective, which analyses an action based on its outcomes. If the consequence is right then the action is right or vice-versa (West, 2013). However, Kant theory believes in a perspective, which analyses the action prior to its consequences. Further, it does not focus on the outcomes; it rather governs the action based on psychological aspects (Ameriks, 2014). The Utilitarianism theory believes in the consequence of an action, it never cares the nature of work (Conway Gawronski, 2013). Moreover, it is clearly evident that a consequence outcome of an action is of utmost important in the Utilitarianism theory. This belief is extremely effective in bringing out the desired consequences. However, in doing so, it often becomes an ignorant body to the human life (Gray Schein, 2012). The particular theory does not find a strong foothold in organizations across the globe for its hard core nature to the human sentiments. Human sentiments have no values for a utilitarian approach. Nonetheless, the adherence of this theory in organizations would affect the morale of their working (Conway Gawronski, 2013). They would feel demoralized, which can also affect their respective responsibilities in organizations. Applying hard core rules to the organizational behaviour might find certain favours but that does not hold any guarantee of a sublime commitmen t from employees (Gray Schein, 2012). The support of some employees might have occurred because of the fact that they do not have sufficient guts to protest the organizational obligations. However, these kinds of employees are less in number across the organizations in the globe. Moreover, the probable situation, which could arise in organizations with the adherence of the Utilitarianism theory, might destroy the fundamental organizational practice, which is indeed extremely important for its successful operations (Conway Gawronski, 2013). Kants ethics respect the moral values of human behaviour in organizational practices. The theory though respects the organizational hard core nature towards the job responsibility of employees. However, it does not believe in such a hard core rules obligations to employees, which could attract suicide cases in case of not meeting with the organizational requirement (West, 2013). The theory mainly focuses on human values and keeps it above all the organizational fundamentals. Moreover, it believes that if human values are kept secured, it would result in a better performance. As per the Kant theory, some of the suicide cases happen because of the compulsions, which organizations impose on employees (Ameriks, 2014). Motivation is an important characteristic of employees, which is driven by certain factors that acts as a catalyst in promoting the beliefs in employees. A half-hearted dedication might not produce the desired result for an organization as it affects the functionalities of morale behaviour. Nevertheless, an entire motivation is not possible in organizational practices. However, the maximum practising of it is only possibly if the Kant theory finds its obligations across the organizations in the globe (Conway Gawronski, 2013). The Kant theory is highly effective in enhancing the moral values of employees in organizations. However, the Utilitarianism approach merely supports any human values apart from its hard core rules obligations. It rather supports the productive nature of an action, which is not favourable for employees in most of the cases. Due to the moral values of the Kant theory, which it imparts to its followers, the theory finds a foothold in organizational practices. References: Ameriks, K. (2014). Kant's moral and legal philosophy. Conway, P., Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.Journal of personality and social psychology,104(2), 216. Gray, K., Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism.Review of Philosophy and Psychology,3(3), 405-423. West, H. R. (2013). Utilitarianism.The international encyclopedia of ethics.